Home | About Us | Search  
News Archives

Doubles Rankings

North American and Canadian Rankings available for:

Men's - As of September 26, 2006

Open, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75

Women's - As of September 26, 2006

Open, 40, 45, 50

Mixed - As of January 2006

Men's Open, 40, 50, 55

Women's Open, 40, 50, 55

North American Doubles Rankings Criteria
(December, 2005)

As North American doubles tournaments have proliferated in both number and participants, there has been an increased need for a ranking system to both recognize accomplishment and importantly to help tournament directors seed their events more accurately. Accordingly, a formulaic ranking system has been created to include both Canadian and United States events. The system has the following characteristics:

  • Rankings take into account the best four (4) results of a player over the past two (2) years from all sanctioned approved play (includes play in different divisions).
  • Rankings are based on total accumulated points from the four best results over the course of a two-season revolving cycle. Points are allocated by tournament results (Champion = 60, Finalist = 45, etc.). Points for the current year are valued @ 100% and @ 75% for the previous year. The total accumulated points are divided by 4 to determine a player’s current standing. A player may be ranked in more than one division provided he has played at least one event in that division over the 2-year period. To be ranked in the Open, the requirement is three events.
  • Points earned in an age division are worth 80% of the value of the previous division. For example, points earned in the 55’s are worth 80% of the same points earned in the 50’s. This process enables players moving up a division in the two-year period to carry results forward into the new division.
  • Each division is assigned a “strength of draw” factor based on the number and ranking of players entered. That factor is multiplied by the points earned in the division. These factors will change from year to year based on the draws. The highest weightings are usually assigned to the Worlds and the national championships.
  • Tournament directors retain a degree of discretion to account for players/teams with an established history but insufficient data.

    Ranking Committee:
    Lolly Gillen, Alan Grant,
    Mike McGorry & Tom Poor


 


Squash British Columbia
4867 Ontario Street
Vancouver, BC
V5V 3H4
Phone: (604)737-3084, Fax: (604)736-3527,
Please contact us at info@squashbc.com